(c) Risk committee members can be either executive or non-executive.Required:(i) Distinguish between executive and non-executive directors. (2 marks) - 题多多

违法和不良信息举报联系客服

免费注册登录

题目

(c) Risk committee members can be either executive or non-executive.

Required:

(i) Distinguish between executive and non-executive directors. (2 marks)

更多“(c) Risk committee members can be either executive or non-executive.Required:(i) Distinguish between executive and non-executive directors. (2 marks)”相关问题

第1题

2 Chen Products produces four manufactured products: Products 1, 2, 3 and 4. The company’s risk committee recentlymet to discuss how the company might respond to a number of problems that have arisen with Product 2. After anumber of incidents in which Product 2 had failed whilst being used by customers, Chen Products had been presentedwith compensation claims from customers injured and inconvenienced by the product failure. It was decided that therisk committee should meet to discuss the options.When the discussion of Product 2 began, committee chairman Anne Ricardo reminded her colleagues that, apart fromthe compensation claims, Product 2 was a highly profitable product.Chen’s risk management committee comprised four non-executive directors who each had different backgrounds andareas of expertise. None of them had direct experience of Chen’s industry or products. It was noted that it wascommon for them to disagree among themselves as to how risks should be managed and that in some situations,each member proposed a quite different strategy to manage a given risk. This was the case when they discussedwhich risk management strategy to adopt with regard to Product 2.Required:(a) Describe the typical roles of a risk management committee. (6 marks)

点击查看答案
第2题

(ii) Evaluate the relative advantages and disadvantages of Chen’s risk management committee beingnon-executive rather than executive in nature. (7 marks)

点击查看答案
第3题

3 Susan Paullaos was recently appointed as a non-executive member of the internal audit committee of Gluck andGoodman, a public listed company producing complex engineering products. Barney Chester, the executive financedirector who chairs the committee, has always viewed the purpose of internal audit as primarily financial in natureand as long as financial controls are seen to be fully in place, he is less concerned with other aspects of internalcontrol. When Susan asked about operational controls in the production facility Barney said that these were not theconcern of the internal audit committee. This, he said, was because as long as the accounting systems and financialcontrols were fully functional, all other systems may be assumed to be working correctly.Susan, however, was concerned with the operational and quality controls in the production facility. She spoke toproduction director Aaron Hardanger, and asked if he would be prepared to produce regular reports for the internalaudit committee on levels of specification compliance and other control issues. Mr Hardanger said that the internalaudit committee had always trusted him because his reputation as a manager was very good. He said that he hadnever been asked to provide compliance evidence to the internal audit committee and saw no reason as to why heshould start doing so now.At board level, the non-executive chairman, George Allejandra, said that he only instituted the internal audit committeein the first place in order to be seen to be in compliance with the stock market’s requirement that Gluck and Goodmanshould have one. He believed that internal audit committees didn’t add materially to the company. They were, hebelieved, one of those ‘outrageous demands’ that regulatory authorities made without considering the consequencesin smaller companies nor the individual needs of different companies. He also complained about the need to have aninternal auditor. He said that Gluck and Goodman used to have a full time internal auditor but when he left a yearago, he wasn’t replaced. The audit committee didn’t feel it needed an internal auditor because Barney Chester believedthat only financial control information was important and he could get that information from his managementaccountant.Susan asked Mr Allejandra if he recognised that the company was exposing itself to increased market risks by failingto have an effective audit committee. Mr Allejandra said he didn’t know what a market risk was.Required:(a) Internal control and audit are considered to be important parts of sound corporate governance.(i) Describe FIVE general objectives of internal control. (5 marks)

点击查看答案
第4题

(c) Define ‘market risk’ for Mr Allejandra and explain why Gluck and Goodman’s market risk exposure isincreased by failing to have an effective audit committee. (5 marks)

点击查看答案
第5题

In relation to the law of contract, distinguish between and explain the effect of:(a) a term and a mere representation; (3 marks)(b) express and implied terms, paying particular regard to the circumstances under which terms may be implied in contracts. (7 marks)

点击查看答案
第6题

TQ Company, a listed company, recently went into administration (it had become insolvent and was being managed by a firm of insolvency practitioners). A group of shareholders expressed the belief that it was the chairman, Miss Heike Hoiku, who was primarily to blame. Although the company’s management had made a number of strategic errors that brought about the company failure, the shareholders blamed the chairman for failing to hold senior management to account. In particular, they were angry that Miss Hoiku had not challenged chief executive Rupert Smith who was regarded by some as arrogant and domineering. Some said that Miss Hoiku was scared of Mr Smith.Some shareholders wrote a letter to Miss Hoiku last year demanding that she hold Mr Smith to account for a number of previous strategic errors. They also asked her to explain why she had not warned of the strategic problems in her chairman’s statement in the annual report earlier in the year. In particular, they asked if she could remove Mr Smith from office for incompetence. Miss Hoiku replied saying that whilst she understood their concerns, it was difficult to remove a serving chief executive from office.Some of the shareholders believed that Mr Smith may have performed better in his role had his reward package been better designed in the first place. There was previously a remuneration committee at TQ but when two of its four non-executive members left the company, they were not replaced and so the committee effectively collapsed.Mr Smith was then able to propose his own remuneration package and Miss Hoiku did not feel able to refuse him.He massively increased the proportion of the package that was basic salary and also awarded himself a new and much more expensive company car. Some shareholders regarded the car as ‘excessively’ expensive. In addition, suspecting that the company’s performance might deteriorate this year, he exercised all of his share options last year and immediately sold all of his shares in TQ Company.It was noted that Mr Smith spent long periods of time travelling away on company business whilst less experienced directors struggled with implementing strategy at the company headquarters. This meant that operational procedures were often uncoordinated and this was one of the causes of the eventual strategic failure.(a) Miss Hoiku stated that it was difficult to remove a serving chief executive from office.Required:(i) Explain the ways in which a company director can leave the service of a board. (4 marks)(ii) Discuss Miss Hoiku’s statement that it is difficult to remove a serving chief executive from a board.(4 marks)(b) Assess, in the context of the case, the importance of the chairman’s statement to shareholders in TQCompany’s annual report. (5 marks)(c) Criticise the structure of the reward package that Mr Smith awarded himself. (4 marks)(d) Criticise Miss Hoiku’s performance as chairman of TQ Company. (8 marks)

点击查看答案
第7题

4 (a) ISA 701 Modifications to The Independent Auditor’s Report includes ‘suggested wording of modifying phrasesfor use when issuing modified reports’.Required:Explain and distinguish between each of the following terms:(i) ‘qualified opinion’;(ii) ‘disclaimer of opinion’;(iii) ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’. (6 marks)

点击查看答案

相关内容